MTP: Not a bad days work.

You know, I am usually one to avoid the Talk Shows, for fear of the bullshit wind tunnel effect of the insular belt-way hot air. But I watched Russer today after Biden was done, and, while Timmy tried to veer towards Democratic responsibility, Woodruff, Gregory, Broder and Robinson were all painting a bleak picture for the Administration and for Republicans generally. Heck Judy even said the blogs linked Melon-head to Woodward - who they had just shit all over - and he had to respond, "I'm no Bob Woodward." Given expectations, not a bad days work.

And what is this about?

Tim Russert... Let me turn to the CIA leak investigation. Time magazine reports that Viveca Novak of Time magazine has now been subpoenaed to testify.

Why Fitz is focused on Perjury and Obstruction.

In the affidavit that Fitz just posted, he has indicated that his narrow focus on perjury - while putatively necessary because there is "sand in his eyes" - may be intended to steer clear of having to deal extensively in classified information.

Check this out...

(Because it is far easier for the parties and the court to deal with declassified materials than to deal with classified information,we will be seeking a classification review wherever appropriate,though those reviews can be cumbersome.) Because the indictment in this case charges obstruction offenses rather than substantive national security crimes, it is hoped that the case can be tried with a minimum ofissues concerning classified information needing to be resolved, and thus that the trial may be conducted in as public a manner as possible.

Did Rove sell out Hadley to give Fitz pause?

The night before the Libby Indictment, ISIKOFF AND WOODWARD were. Here is a key exchange...

ISIKOFF: I talked to a source at the White House late this afternoon who told me that Bob [Woodward] is going to have a bombshell in tomorrow's paper identifying the Mr. X source who is behind the whole thing. So, I don't know, maybe this is Bob's opportunity.

KING (to WOODWARD): Come clean.

Who was Isikoff's source? I have heard that when Isikoff quotes someone in the White House on something juicy, it is usually Rove...

Does that mean that Rove tipped Fitzgerald about the leak to Woodward as well?

Is that what gave Fitzgerald pause on indicting Rove?

Did Rove give up Hadley to steer clear of being indicted himself in the first round?

Did he use it to explain the e-mail to Hadley?

"Matt Cooper called to give me a heads-up that he's got a welfare-reform story coming," Rove wrote Hadley. "When he finished his brief heads-up, he immediately launched into Niger. Isn't this damaging? Hasn't the president been hurt? I didn't take the bait, but I said if I were him, I wouldn't get Time far out in front on this."

So - in the eleventh hour - does Rove explain to Fitz that this e-mail was his response to Hadley's request to let the press know about Wilson's wife?

Was this Rove's way of confirming that he had done that job?

Grand Theft Ohio: Neither Hackett nor Brown have a chance.

Forgive me if there has been attention to this already, but the discrpancy between the last poll by the Columbus Dispatch and 4 of the 5 ballot initatives is TRULY FUCKING STAGGERING.  I know we were all crying foul in 2004, and I was right there with everyone, but where are Congressmen Conyers and his colleagues now?  Check out these discrepancies...

ISSUE 1 ($2 Billion State Bond initiative)
PRE-POLLING: 53% Yes, 27% No, 20% Undecided
FINAL RESULT: 54% Yes, 45% No

ISSUE 2 (Allow easier absentee balloting)
PRE-POLLING: 59% Yes, 33% No, 9% Undecided
FINAL RESULT: 36% Yes, 63% No

ISSUE 3 (Revise campaign contribution limits)
PRE-POLLING: 61% Yes, 25% No, 14% Undecided
FINAL RESULT: 33% Yes, 66% No

ISSUE 4 (Ind. Comm. to draw Congressional Districts)
PRE-POLLING: 31% Yes, 45% No, 25% Undecided
FINAL RESULT: 30% Yes, 69% No

ISSUE 5 (Ind. Board instead of Sec. of State to oversee elections)
PRE-POLLING: 41% Yes, 43% No, 16% Undecided
FINAL RESULT: 29% Yes, 70% No

The original reporting on this comes from  Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman at the Free Press, with some amplification and illumination by  Brad Friedman at The Huffington Post.

Folks put a fork in our democracy.  Dewine and Balckwell will win in '06 and Cheney will be President in '08.  I mean look at this...

...the Sunday Dispatch also carried another headline: "44 counties will break in new voting machines." Forty-one of those counties "will be using new electronic touch screens from Diebold Election System," the Dispatch added.

Diebold's controversial CEO Walden O'Dell, a major GOP donor, made national headlines in 2003 with a fundraising letter pledging to deliver Ohio's 2004 electoral votes to Bush.

Every vote in Ohio 2004 was cast or counted on an electronic device. About 15%---some 800,000 votes---were cast on electronic touchscreen machines with no paper trail. The number was about seven times higher than Bush's official 118,775-vote margin of victory. Nearly all the rest of the votes were cast on punch cards or scantron ballots counted by opti-scan devices---some of them made by Diebold---then tallied at central computer stations in each of Ohio's 88 counties.

According to a recent General Accountability Office report, all such technologies are easily hacked. Vote skimming and tipping are readily available to those who would manipulate the vote. Vote switching could be especially easy for those with access to networks by which many of the computers are linked. Such machines and networks, said the GAO, had widespread problems with "security and reliability." Among them were "weak security controls, system design flaws, inadequate security testing, incorrect system configuration, poor security management and vague or incomplete voting system standards, among other issues."

With the 2005 expansion of paperless touch-screen machines into 41 more Ohio counties, this year's election was more vulnerable than ever to centralized manipulation. The outcomes on Issues 2-5 would indicate just that.

The new touchscreen machines were brought in by Blackwell, who had vowed to take the state to an entirely e-based voting regime.

As in 2004, there were instances of chaos. In inner city, heavily Democratic precincts in Montgomery County, the Dayton Daily News reported: "Vote count goes on all night: Errors, unfamiliarity with computerized voting at heart of problem." Among other things, 186 memory cards from the e-voting machines went missing, prompting election workers in some cases to search for them with flashlights before all were allegedly found.

Read the articles in full AND BRING THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF Sherrod Brown, Paul Hackett, Hillary Clinton, Mark Warner and anyone else who hopes to have a chance of winning an election in Ohio in the near future..

Picture of the Day